Analyzing your Trading stats Month 10 - Bear Market Trader
Day trader, day trader life, trading journal, trading lifestyle, tracking stats, tracking your trading stats,

Analyzing your Trading stats Month 10

Analyzing your Trading stats Month 10

Ana­lyz­ing your Trad­ing stats — Month 10

#fin­twit #order­flow #day­trad­ing #trad­ing­forex #forex #trad­ingjour­nal #day­trad­ing #trad­inglifestyle #day­trader­life #track­y­ourstats #trad­ingstats

So you’ve been trad­ing for a while. How do you know what to look for? How do you know what you are doing right and wrong? Which set­up works best? What time of day works best? How long do I let win­ners and losers run? How much is my expectan­cy? What is my risk to reward ratio? In oth­er words: how much mon­ey am I putting on the line to make how much? Just by look­ing at these stats you will get real insight into your strengths and weak­ness­es. Do not over­look this. Do not be one of those peo­ple that just trade and trade and trade but nev­er review and won­der where they went wrong. You need to know what to improve upon. 

Thank you for fol­low­ing my progress

First off. For those of you that have been fol­low­ing my jour­ney I’d like to give a big thank you! Almost every­day I upload trad­ing plans and a Dai­ly Report Card. I sin­cere­ly hope my jour­ney some­how adds to your own. Keep in mind that this is my jour­ney and might not fit yours. It is up to you to decide what you’d like to take away from this and what to ignore. This is not advice what­so­ev­er. Hav­ing said that… Let’s get it on!


The stats that I am about to share with you help me track what I deem to be impor­tant. These most­ly focus more on my process than actu­al­ly mak­ing mon­ey. Process is king. Mon­ey is just a result of per­form­ing well on your process. Let’s get to some stats.

DRC Track­ing Stats

Here you can find the details of my DRC track­ing sheet. DRC stands for Dai­ly Report Cards. If you would like to take a look at some exam­ples you can do so here. Every trad­ing day I recap my notes, trades, and per­for­mance. I grade myself on how well I exe­cut­ed my plan as this is the most impor­tant. Liv­ing in a prob­a­bilis­tic world of trad­ing mak­ing mon­ey is a side-effect of trad­ing your plan. No one real trad­er in the world has a 100% win rate (if they do please run away quick­ly). If you like to know more on how I track my stats just hit me up. I freely share this information. 


First of all I got­ta say… I love going through my stats. It’s a huge part of the process that tells me how well or not I am per­form­ing. Ulti­mate­ly my process is the only thing I can con­trol. My stats give me the insights I need to under­stand my edge bet­ter. Then tweak or let it be. Rinse and repeat. 

March could have def­i­nite­ly been bet­ter for me as I will show you lat­er on. A mis­take in tak­ing an exper­i­men­tal trade ear­ly in the month, to a few loss­es lat­er on. I like to think that in my first month trad­ing a big­ger account did not have any impact on me but I would be lying. Even though I believe it was not as much of a fac­tor. I feel I final­ly was con­scious­ly mak­ing deci­sions to take trades or not. ‘To trade OR not to trade is the ques­tion’ for every day trader 🙂 

Trad­ing a ‘small­er’ account I think made me a lit­tle com­pla­cent which if you look at my stats it worked out I guess. Got­ten a bit lucky is more like it.

I’ll explain more when we go through the details of the trades tak­en and oppor­tu­ni­ties missed. Let’s get to some numbers.

Equi­ty curve

Start­ed the month with +11.33% and cur­rent­ly I am at +8.34%. Down by ‑2.99%. 


Over­all Evaluation

Month­ly DRC Track­ing Stats

Last time I dove deep­er into some oth­er stats. I don’t want to focus too much on these every month as I need a larg­er data sam­ple for these stats to have more val­ue. These stats I sim­ply look at out­liers. Stats that stick out rather than look at its entire­ty because they don’t mat­ter as much. The out­liers give me more insight in where I still need improve­ment or to tell me where my edge is slight­ly better.

Day of the week

Open Val­ue Sentiment

Entry TPO

Oppor­tu­ni­ties Presented

Please under­stand that a lot of these met­rics have a lev­el of sub­jec­tiv­i­ty about them. In terms of what I deter­mine to be an oppor­tu­ni­ty for exam­ple. Although I use a sys­tem­at­ic approach and thus have hard rules to trade. I am also improv­ing my entries and thus my rules are ever slight­ly chang­ing a bit. So one time I’ll take an oppor­tu­ni­ty where the next I might not based on these ‘new’ rules as I am gain­ing con­fi­dence on trad­ing the low­er time­frames. You have to fig­ure out the frame­work of which you your­self will grade your­self on a job well done or not. These are mine… They might not fit yours. How­ev­er, you’ll get a good insight into my thought-process and in the end that is all you should be learn­ing from oth­er traders. With that out of the way. 

I first have to make the sep­a­ra­tion between GBPNZD and Gold. I pri­mar­i­ly focus on GBPNZD but when ranges are too tight (thus sta­tis­ti­cal­ly oblit­er­at­ing my edge) I focus on Gold. Although I have been exper­i­ment­ing a lit­tle with try­ing to trade both assets at the same time. Trad­ing one asset is already hard so the focus on this hasn’t been the great­est at this stage of my trad­ing progress. 


For the whole month I sat down to observe the mar­ket (not trade, we don’t trade for trad­ing sake. We observe, take notes, if an oppor­tu­ni­ty comes to us we exe­cute):  Not going to talk about the days that the range was too tight or I couldn’t, did not want to, what­ev­er rea­son, not trade that day. 

From the 20 days I observed there were 17 days that pre­sent­ed with an oppor­tu­ni­ty. On 7 of them I actu­al­ly took the opportunity. 

  • 4 win­ners
    • 0.6R
    • 0.5R
    • 0.4R
    • 0.4R
  • 4 losers
    • -1R
    • -2R
    • -0.2R
    • -1R
  • Win rate 50%

Although, I am over­all still in prof­it here we can see that my loss­es not only exceed my wins but they also exceed in amount (very low prof­it fac­tor). Mean­ing on aver­age I lose more on a trade than I make. This is why my prof­it fac­tor dropped to 0.41. Which is not a good num­ber. This should prefer­ably be more than 1.5.

Let’s dive deep­er. To do that I added a new for­mat to my process where I go back and review my trades. These reviews you can find by click­ing here: Trade Reviews. They include pic­tures of entries and exits as well as com­men­tary on both. There­fore I am not going to dis­cuss these here in detail as I have already done so. I review on the trad­ing day itself. Then again on the week­end review­ing my screen record­ings and notes. 

Hypos and Missed Opportunities

Every trad­ing day I for­mu­late 1 to 3, some­times 4, hypothe­ses. These give me a frame­work to what I expect to see in the mar­ket on that day. Then dur­ing the ses­sion I wait for price action to con­firm or negate a hypoth­e­sis. If price action con­firms I exe­cute a trade. If the trade is based on a hypo it is more like­ly to be a good trade (no guar­an­tees of course, we are sim­ply look­ing for high­er prob­a­bil­i­ty out­comes). So win or loss it was a good trade. This is not always the case as I of course make mis­takes and exe­cute a trade on the wrong hypo. But by track­ing these stats I get bet­ter insights into 1) did I for­mu­late the right hypo 2) did I exe­cute based on the hypo and if not I gain insights into why I did not. Using these met­rics I keep myself in check but also gath­er data on if I am hes­i­tat­ing more than not or if I am not aligned with mar­ket conditions. 

Here you can see that most of the times I am more cor­rect in my first hypoth­e­sis (hypo 1) of what the mar­ket is more like­ly to do. Then I also start­ed track­ing to what extend that hypo played out. If you look at my hypothe­ses here you can see that I also hypoth­e­size what price action or order­flow event I pre­fer to see. Then I grade myself on the cor­rect­ness of said assump­tion. So 1) was the hypoth­e­sis a valid one 2) to what extent was it valid? No real out­liers here hence the stronger need to focus on out­liers as it is in the extremes that we can poten­tial­ly find valu­able information. 

Based on get­ting a lot of hypos right you’d think I’d be tak­ing more trades. How­ev­er, it does­n’t always fit my cri­te­ria giv­ing enough prof­it tar­get. Or I sim­ply don’t feel like it. All of these met­rics are a part of my edge and it is up to me to fig­ure out how to improve.

On the missed oppor­tu­ni­ties I will be focus­ing more on GBPNZD than on Gold as that is my main focus. From the 20 days I observed there were 17 days that pre­sent­ed an oppor­tu­ni­ty. Of which I only trad­ed on 8 days. What hap­pened to those oth­er days? Let’s find out. 

I clas­si­fied the missed trades under the fol­low­ing 4 categories:

  1. Not fit­ting trad­ing rule
    • 4 times
  2. Lack­ing clarity
    • 2 times
  3. Hes­i­tat­ed
    • 2 times
  4. Not pay­ing attention
    • Once 
  5. Want­i­ng to take it easy
    • Once 

Con­clu­sion: Accord­ing to how well I for­mu­late my hypos and tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the missed oppor­tun­ties. I could have tak­en more trades. When look­ing at my missed oppor­tu­ni­ties I can say I lacked clar­i­ty in cer­tain trades that only con­firmed a hypo after the move had hap­pened. Thus I lacked the clar­i­ty before­hand to take advan­tage of them. The ones not fit­ting my cur­rectn trad­ing rules are ones that I am still build­ing con­fi­dence in. They days I hes­i­tat­ed I was­n’t feel­ing too con­fi­dent and just let the trade go. Which is not nec­es­sar­i­ly a bad thing. I will keep taps on these met­rics to find out­liers as I go along. 

Trades taken

I went back and looked if I grasshop­pered out of a trade what that trade would have done. With that I mean if I had actu­al­ly tak­en my price action-based exit rule. On top of that I want­ed to know what a time-based exit would have done. To get bet­ter insight into what I could poten­tial­ly do bet­ter this com­ing month. Or at least set a goal. To do this I looked what a price action and time-based exit rule would have done. 

March 2nd:

Quick recap: Obvi­ous­ly here if I had cho­sen to wait for a price action exit rule I would have net­ted more. 

  • Trade net­ted: 0.6R
  • Price action-based exit rule: 2R
  • Time-based exit rule: 1R

March 5th:

Quick recap: On a nor­mal day I believe the the­sis would have held up. Since it wasn’t: I could have 1) not trad­ed this day due to price being messy due to Non-Farm Fri­day 2) I could have poten­tial­ly opt­ed for a 2nd chance entry on the new­ly formed M30 C‑sup due to the lack of momen­tum on this par­tic­u­lar day. I will need more sta­tis­tics on this par­tic­u­lar even to back up this the­sis though which will be one of my goals for NFF from this day on. Hav­ing said that this par­tic­u­lar day would have been quite ago­niz­ing so there is a point to be made that men­tal cap­i­tal preser­va­tion could be cho­sen over a poten­tial­ly high risk trade. Will gath­er more stats to deny or con­firm this. 

  • Trade net­ted: ‑1R — SL got hit
  • Price action-based exit rule: About 1–1.5R if I had obtained a bet­ter entry the trade would have netted
  • Time-based exit rule: About 1R 

March 8th:

Quick recap: I should not have tak­en the late-sus­tained auc­tion entry as there was less con­flu­ence + M30/M15 already print­ing a rever­sal (even though this got tak­en out again lat­er in the ses­sion but hind­sight is 20/20. We trade what we see in the moment and I ‘missed’ or did not give enough weight to this price action). Same for the sin­gle print fade as ADR had been exhaust­ed and M30 con­sol­i­da­tion had a weak bear engulf attempt of a break down. As well as struc­ture that was cre­at­ed was very wide in value. 

  • Trade net­ted: ‑1R — SL got hit, ‑1R — SL got hit
  • Price action-based exit rule: I should not have been in either of these trades
  • Time-based exit rule: N.A.

March 10th:

Quick recap: Not take this trade even though I net­ted minor prof­its. Even though there was a close well out­side of val­ue there was no IB exten­sion to con­firm the rejec­tion. Thus a bal­anc­ing mar­ket / val­ue rejec­tion fail­ure was the more prob­a­ble play. A play off the M30 Inside bar cou­pled with LTF price action would have been the best entry. 

  • Trade net­ted: 0.5R
  • Price action-based exit rule: 0.5R
  • Time-based exit rule: Would have been stopped out ‑1R

March 17th:

Quick recap: I could have not grasshop­pered out of the trade and stuck with it. If the trade was worth tak­ing it was worth fol­low­ing my exit rules. 

  • Trade net­ted: ‑0.2R
  • Price action-based exit rule: 0.5R
  • Time-based exit rule: 0.1R

March 19th:

Quick recap: I could have the­o­rized that the exten­sion above IB indi­cat­ed for more upside and should have wait­ed for more con­flu­ence in terms of a sell­ing tail on the pro­file. Although with the infor­ma­tion pre­sent­ed I was think­ing it wasn’t the worst of oppor­tu­ni­ties. Cer­tain­ly not the best either. 

With the ini­tial exten­sion above IB, and no sell­ing tail, I could have wait­ed for more upside before war­rant­i­ng a short at the next DTTZ.

  • Trade net­ted: ‑1R
  • Price action-based exit rule: SL got hit
  • Time-based exit rule: SL got hit

March 23rd:

Quick recap: I could have giv­en more weight to the trend as H4 and D1 were up. W1 sup­ply had been tak­en out, hit­ting MN boase lev­el indi­cat­ing more con­tin­u­a­tion, as well as ADR got exhaust­ed pre­mar­ket with a huge imbal­ance indi­cat­ing a pos­si­ble strength behind the move. Thus a play off M30 VWAP in UT leav­ing a buy­ing tail in F could have been a bet­ter play. 

  • Trade net­ted: 0.4R
  • Price action-based exit rule: ‑0.2R
  • Time-based exit rule: ‑1R — SL would have been hit

March 26th:

Quick recap: I want to say that I did well to pock­et the 0.4R when I did. How­ev­er this was not rule-based. This was me observ­ing a fail­ure to break LTF demand and price tak­ing a long time before actu­al­ly doing so. Thus on the next retest of LTF demand I wait­ed and when price start­ed ‘pop­ping’ a few pips above I decid­ed it was enough and cut the trade.

  • Trade net­ted: 0.4R
  • Price action-based exit rule: ‑0.3R
  • Time-based exit rule: Scratched for 0R


With Gold I also sat down 20 days to observe. Of these days 18 pre­sent­ed oppor­tu­ni­ties of which I cap­i­tal­ized on 2 times. 

  • 0 win­ners
    • 1 scratch
  • 1 los­er
    • -0.5R
  • Win rate 50%

As I am still very much focused on GBPNZD I don’t push myself too much on tak­ing trades on Gold. Unless there is a tight range on GBPNZD and thus I can’t trade it. I have tak­en two trades of which the first was a scratch as I was in a trade on GBPNZD simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. The FX pair was mov­ing in my favor at the same time Gold was at entry lev­el. I decid­ed to take both off at the same time pock­et­ing a prof­it on the FX pair and scratch­ing on Gold. Then I have one loss.

March 2nd:

Quick recap: I could have let the trade on also due to the invert­ed cor­re­la­tion with GBPNZD (which doesn’t always work — 72%) and C clos­ing neu­tral and ham­mers being prone to see a con­tin­u­a­tion instead of a reversal. 

  • Trade net­ted: 0R
  • Price action-based exit rule: 2R
  • Time-based exit rule: 0.7R

March 19th:

Quick recap: I believe it was pre­ma­ture to have tak­en this trade. I should have wait­ed for a stronger buy sig­nal before enter­ing. In hind­sight this strong buy sig­nal did not real­ly come to be hon­est. Although a con­sol­i­da­tion on M15 at H4 demand with the right time of day could have war­rant­ed an entry. This time the move hap­pened out­side of my trad­ing win­dow but it was good to have observed. 

  • Trade net­ted: ‑0.5R
  • Price action-based exit rule: ‑0.5R
  • Time-based exit rule: ‑0.2R

Totals and Conclusion

Trades net­ted: ‑2.8R

Price action-based exit rule: 2.5R

Time-based exit rule: ‑2.4R

What can I say or con­clude about these met­rics? Clear price-action based rule is the win­ner as it would have net­ted the best out­come for this month. This is not account­ing for all of the missed oppor­tu­ni­ties there were. At least it gives a lit­tle insight into my exit rules. I still have to count in the fact that cer­tain trades I should not have tak­en at all as they were against the over­all mar­ket direc­tions. If I had aligned myself well in those cas­es I could have net­ted even more of course but that is not the issue right now. Trad­ing a big­ger account has made me go back to my grasshop­per­ing days. And even though I tried to cor­rect myself mid-month it wasn’t enough to help me end in the green. It did how­ev­er gave me valu­able infor­ma­tion to build off bet­ter habits for the com­ing month. I will make the price action-based rule a hard goal for next month. 


My main objec­tives for the month of March were:

  • Only trade the main account
  • Focus on time-based exits
  • Don’t look at M5 chart unless with­in the last half hour of trad­ing window

I believe I did well on the first one as I have only trad­ed the main account. This was some­what of a bot­tle­neck for me and skewed my stats by trad­ing a small­er and big­ger account. Hence I decid­ed to ONLY trade the big­ger account which I dubbed my main account. All the paper trades from now on will no longer be done on the small­er account. This was too easy for me to take a trade on the small­er account. I want­ed my trades to reflect my ‘con­scious trad­ing’ if that makes sense. I did well here though as I had no prob­lem tak­ing trades on the big­ger account. I also had no prob­lems tak­ing a loss. Sev­er­al loss­es even. I was/am focused on the process and if there is any­thing to take away from this exer­cise it is this: I can trade with­out car­ing about the mon­ey. Says the lit­tle grasshop­per. Alright, my grasshop­per­ing had oth­er some valid rea­sons as well okay. 

Focus­ing on time-based exits I did not do too well. Although, what it did do is force me to focus on Day Trad­ing Time Zones (DTTZ) and price action sur­round­ing them. This one I will rephrase into being mind­ful of DTTZs for next month.

Not look­ing at M5 chart I kind of failed as I was still peek­ing at times. Although I must say that as the month went along I did not base much of my deci­sions off it. For the next month I will focus on the 1st DTTZ for a poten­tial M5 entry to get a bet­ter entry off of a M30 for­ma­tion. Oth­er­wise only allowed at the 2nd DTTZ for entries/exits. 

  • Only trade the main account
  • Be mind­ful of DTTZs
  • Only price-action based exit rules (or hit time stop)
  • M15/M30 com­bi­na­tion at 1st DTTZ, M5 entries and exits at 2nd DTTZ

Pre­vi­ous Month­ly Goals

  • Con­tin­ue track­ing hypos
    • Love this and it is such an inte­gral part of my process so will keep doing this and not men­tion under my goals.
  • Focus on my own progress and less on others
    • I have been doing well here. Dis­con­tin­ue exercise. 
  • Feel­ing okay with NOT trading 
    • I have been doing well here. Dis­con­tin­ue exercise. 
  • Don’t trade dur­ing TPO C, unless there is a momen­tum trade
    • I have been doing well here. Dis­con­tin­ue exercise. 
  • Have ‘qui­eter’ weekends
    • I have been doing well here. Dis­con­tin­ue exercise. 
  • Min­i­mum of 3 days of work­ing out, aim for 5.
    • This one I will keep as I have been try­ing to increase my gym time but it still fluc­tu­ates too much. 

If you have made it all the way through… Here is a FREE LAMBO!!! 

Sor­ry no Lam­bo. Nonethe­less, I great­ly appre­ci­ate your inter­est in my jour­ney. I’m sure it is not an easy read as I tend to get long-wind­ed. This and I love me some stats 🙂 If you have any com­ments or sug­ges­tions feel free to let me know. Even though I do like writ­ing I don’t con­sid­er myself to be much of a writer. Get in touch if you have any com­ments or ques­tions or just come say Hi!


Day trader. Tech geek. Sim racer/Pilot.

No Comments

Post A Comment